Skip to content
cyberexploits
webappphptext

WordPress Core & MU & Plugins - Privileges Unchecked in 'admin.php' / Multiple Information Disclosures

WordPress Core & MU & Plugins - Privileges Unchecked in 'admin.php' / Multiple Information Disclosures

Published on 2009-07-10

Source code

Pinned to commit 7eac4c3a2ce5
textplatforms/php/webapps/9110.txt7eac4c3a
raw
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA1



      Core Security Technologies - CoreLabs Advisory

           http://www.coresecurity.com/corelabs/



WordPress Privileges Unchecked in admin.php and Multiple Information

Disclosures







1. *Advisory Information*



Title: WordPress Privileges Unchecked in admin.php and Multiple

Information Disclosures

Advisory ID: CORE-2009-0515

Advisory URL:

http://corelabs.coresecurity.com/index.php?action=view&type=advisory&name=WordPress_Privileges_Unchecked

Date published: 2009-07-08

Date of last update: 2009-07-08

Vendors contacted: WordPress

Release mode: Coordinated release





2. *Vulnerability Information*



Class: Local file include, Privileges unchecked, Cross site scripting

(XSS), Information disclosure

Remotely Exploitable: Yes

Locally Exploitable: No

Bugtraq ID: 35581, 35584

CVE Name: CVE-2009-2334, CVE-2009-2335, CVE-2009-2336





3. *Vulnerability Description*



WordPress is a web application written in PHP that allows the easy

installation of a flexible weblog on any computer connected to the

Internet. WordPress 2.7 reached more than 6 million downloads during

June 2009 [9].



A vulnerability was found in the way that WordPress handles some URL

requests. This results in unprivileged users viewing the content of

plugins configuration pages, and also in some plugins modifying plugin

options and injecting JavaScript code. Arbitrary native code may be run

by a malicious attacker if the blog administrator runs injected

JavasScript code that edits blog PHP code. Many WordPress-powered blogs,

hosted outside 'wordpress.com', allow any person to create unprivileged

users called subscribers. Other sensitive username information

disclosures were found in WordPress.





4. *Vulnerable packages*



   . WordPress 2.8 and previous

   . WordPress MU 2.7.1 and previous, used in WordPress.com





5. *Non-vulnerable packages*



   . WordPress 2.8.1

   . WordPress MU 2.8.1, used in WordPress.com





6. *Vendor Information, Solutions and Workarounds*



Mitigation for the Privileges Unchecked vulnerability (suggested by Core

Security): this vulnerability may be mitigated by controlling access to

files inside the 'wp-admin' folder. Access can be prohibited by using

Apache access control mechanism ('.htaccess' file), see guideline for

more information [11].





7. *Credits*



These vulnerabilities were discovered and researched by Fernando

Arnaboldi and José Orlicki from Core Security Technologies. Further

research was made by Jose Orlicki from Core Security Technologies.





8. *Technical Description / Proof of Concept Code*





8.1. *Introduction*



In the last few years several security bugs were found in WordPress

[1][2]. During 2008, the big amount of bugs reported by researchers lead

to exploitation by blog spammers [3]. During 2009, a new round of

attacks has appeared and security researchers are reporting new bugs or

wrongly fixed previously-reported bugs [4][5]. A path traversal in local

files included by 'admin.php' has been fixed [6][7] but, in our case, we

report that administrative privileges are still unchecked when accessing

any PHP file inside a plugin folder.





8.2. *Access Control Roles*



WordPress has a privilege model where any user has an assigned role [8].

Regarding plugins only users characterized by the role Administrator can

activate plugins. Notice that only the blog hosting owner can add new

plugins because these must by copied inside the host filesystem. The

roles Editor, Author or Subscriber (the latter has the least privileges)

cannot activate plugins, edit plugins, update plugins nor delete plugins

installed by an Administrator. Besides that, the configuration of

specific plugins is a grey area because there is no distinguished

capability assigned [8].



Also due to cross-site scripting vulnerabilities inside plugins options

(something very common), non-administrative users reconfiguring plugins

may inject persistent JavaScript code. Possibly arbitrary native code

can be executed by the attacker if the blog administrator runs injected

JavasScript code that injects PHP code. It is important to observe that

many WordPress-powered blogs are configured to allow any blog visitor to

create a Subscriber user without confirmation from the Administrator

role inside the following URL, although by default the Administrator

role must create these new users.



/-----------



http://[some_wordpress_blog]/wp-login.php?action=register

- -----------/



 This can be modified by the administrator in 'Membership/Anyone can

register'.



/-----------



http://[some_wordpress_blog]/wp-admin/options-general.php

- -----------/









8.3. *Privileges Unchecked in admin.php?page= Plugin Local File Includes

(CVE-2009-2334, BID 35581)*



No privileges are checked on WordPress plugins configuration PHP modules

using parameter 'page' when we replace 'options-general.php' with

'admin.php'. The same thing happens when replacing other modules such as

'plugins.php' with 'admin.php'. Basic information disclosure is done

this way. For example, with the following URL a user with no privileges

can see the configuration of plugin Collapsing Archives, if installed.



/-----------



http://[some_wordpress_blog]/wp-admin/admin.php?page=/collapsing-archives/options.txt

- -----------/



 Instead of the following allowed URL.



/-----------



http://[some_wordpress_blog]/wp-admin/options-general.php?page=collapsing-archives/options.txt

- -----------/



 Another example of this information disclosure is shown on Akismet, a

plugin shipped by default with WordPress.



/-----------



http://[some_wordpress_blog]/wp-admin/admin.php?page=akismet/readme.txt

- -----------/



 All plugins we have tested are vulnerable to this kind of information

disclosure, but in many of them the PHP files accessed just crashed. On

the other hand, for example, with capability 'import', privileges are

checked inside 'admin.php':



/-----------



if ( ! current_user_can('import') )

    wp_die(__('You are not allowed to import.'));

- -----------/



 More dangerous scenarios exist, all of them can be exploited by users

with the Subscriber role, the least privileged.





8.4. *Abuse example: XSS in plugin configuration module*



If installed, *Related Ways To Take Action* is an example of a WordPress

plugin that is affected by many cross-site scripting vulnerabilities

(XSS) that can be leveraged by an attacker using the unchecked

privileges described in this advisory to inject persistent JavaScript

code. Possibly, arbitrary native code can be executed by the attacker if

the blog administrator, when he/she logs in, runs injected JavasScript

code that edits blog PHP code. The original URL for reconfiguring the

plugin can be accessed only by the Administrator role.



/-----------



http://[some_wordpress_blog]/wordpress/wp-admin/options-general.php?page=related-ways-to-take-action/options.php

- -----------/



 But replacing the PHP file with the generic 'admin.php' any blog user

can modify this configuration.



/-----------



http://[some_wordpress_blog]/wp-admin/admin.php?page=related-ways-to-take-action/options.php

- -----------/



 The following JavaScript injection can be entered within field *Exclude

actions by term* to exemplify this kind of abuse. When the administrator

enters the same page the injected browser code will be executed and

possibly blog PHP can be modified to run arbitrary native code.



/-----------



\"/><script>alert(String.fromCharCode(88)+String.fromCharCode(83)+String.fromCharCode(83))</script><ahref="



- -----------/



 This is the worst scenario that we found for the vulnerability.





8.5. *Abuse example: viewing WP Security Scanner Plugin Dashboard*



If installed, the WordPress Security Scanner Plugin dashboard can be

viewed similarly by any user besides the administrator using the plugin

configuration page URL without modification. This dashboard includes

common default blog configuration settings that are insecure and should

be modified by the blog administrator or hosting.



/-----------



http://[some_wordpress_blog]/wp-admin/admin.php?page=wp-security-scan/securityscan.php

- -----------/









8.6. *Abuse example: reconfiguring WP-IDS, a WordPress Hardening Project*



If installed, the *Intrusion Detection System Plugin (WPIDS)*[10] can be

reconfigured accessed with the same vulnerability.



/-----------



http://[some_wordpress_blog]/wp-admin/index.php?page=wp-ids/ids-admin.php

- -----------/



 This gives an attacker the possibility to disable many features of the

plugin, for example reactivate the forgotten password feature and

reactivate the XML-RPC blog interface. Also you can deny the weblog

service by configuring this plugin to be overly sensitive, blocking any

request. However the plugin cannot be totally disabled because the

essential IDS parameters 'Maximum impact to ignore bad requests' and

'Minimum impact to sanitize bad requests' are verified on the server

side of the blog and cannot be distorted to deactivate the sanitizing or

blocking features of the web IDS plugin.





8.7. *Other Information Disclosures (CVE-2009-2335, CVE-2009-2336, BID

35584)*



WordPress discriminates bad password from bad user logins, this reduces

the complexity of a brute force attack on WordPress blogs login

(CVE-2009-2335, BID 35584). The same user information disclosure happens

when users use the forgotten mail interface to request a new password

(CVE-2009-2336, same BID 35584). These information disclosures seem to

be previously reported [6] but the WordPress team is refusing to modify

them alleging *user convenience*.



Default installation of WordPress 2.7.1 leaks the name of the user

posting entries inside the HTML of the blog.



/-----------



  <small>June 3rd, 2009 <!-- by leakedusername --></small>

- -----------/







Also several administrative modules give to anyone the complete path

where the web application is hosted inside the server. This may simplify

or enable other malicious attacks. An example follows.



/-----------



http://[some_wordpress_blog]/wp-settings.php

- -----------/







/-----------



Notice: Use of undefined constant ABSPATH - assumed 'ABSPATH' in

[WP_LEAKED_PATH]\wp-settings.php on line 110

Notice: Use of undefined constant ABSPATH - assumed 'ABSPATH' in

[WP_LEAKED_PATH]\wp-settings.php on line 112

Warning: require(ABSPATHwp-includes/compat.php) [function.require]:

failed to open stream:

No such file or directory in [WP_LEAKED_PATH]\wp-settings.php on line 246

Fatal error: require() [function.require]: Failed opening required

'ABSPATHwp-includes/compat.php'

(include_path='.;[PHP_LEAKED_PATH]\php5\pear') in

[WP_LEAKED_PATH]\wp-settings.php on line 246



- -----------/









9. *Report Timeline*



. 2009-06-04:

Core Security Technologies notifies the WordPress team of the

vulnerabilities (security@wordpress.org) and offers a technical

description encrypted or in plain-text. Advisory is planned for

publication on June 22th.



. 2009-06-08:

Core notifies again the WordPress team of the vulnerability.



. 2009-06-10:

The WordPress team asks Core for a technical description of the

vulnerability in plain-text.



. 2009-06-11:

Technical details sent to WordPress team by Core.



. 2009-06-11:

WordPress team notifies Core that a fix was produced and is available to

Core for testing. WordPress team asserts that password and username

discrimination as well as username leakage are known and will not be

fixed because they are convenient for the users.



. 2009-06-12:

Core tells the WordPress team that the patch will be tested by Core as a

courtesy as soon as possible. It also requests confirmation that

WordPress versions 2.8 and earlier, and WordPress.com, are vulnerable to

the flaws included in the advisory draft CORE-2009-0515.



. 2009-06-12:

WordPress team confirms that WordPress 2.8 and earlier plus

WordPress.com are vulnerable to the flaws included in the advisory draft.



. 2009-06-17:

Core informs the WordPress team that the patch is only fixing one of the

four proof of concept abuses included in the advisory draft. Core

reminds the WordPress team that the advisory is scheduled to be

published on June 22th but a new schedule can be discussed.



. 2009-06-19:

Core asks for a new patched version of WordPress, if available, and

notifies the WordPress team that the publication of the advisory was

re-scheduled to June 30th.



. 2009-06-19:

WordPress team confirms they have a new patch that has the potential to

break a lot of plugins.



. 2009-06-29:

WordPress team asks for a delayance on advisory CORE-2009-0515

publication until July 6th, when WordPress MU version will be patched.



. 2009-06-29:

Core agrees to delay publication of advisory CORE-2009-0515 until July 6th.



. 2009-06-29:

Core tells the WordPress team that other administrative PHP modules can

also be rendered by non-administrative users, such as module

'admin-post.php' and 'link-parse-opml.php'.



. 2009-07-02:

WordPress team comments that 'admin.php' and 'admin-post.php' are

intentionally open and plugins can choose to hook either privileged or

unprivileged actions. They also comment that unprivileged access to

'link-parse-opml.php' is benign but having this file open is bad form.



. 2009-07-02:

Core sends the WordPress team a new draft of the advisory and comments

that there is no capability specified in Worpress documentation for

configuring plugins. Also control of actions registered by plugins is

not enforced. Core also notices that the privileges unchecked bug in

'admin.php?page=' is fixed on WordPress 2.8.1-beta2 latest development

release.



. 2009-07-06:

Core requests WordPress confirmation of the release date of WordPress

2.8.1 and WordPress MU 2.8.



. 2009-07-07:

WordPress team confirms that a release candidate of WordPress 2.8.1 is

made available to users and that the advisory may be published.



. 2009-07-06:

Core requests WordPress confirmation of the release date of WordPress MU

and WordPress MU new version numbers.



. 2009-07-07:

WordPress team release WordPress 2.8.1 RC1 to its users.



. 2009-07-08:

WordPress team confirms that WordPress MU 2.8.1 will be made available

as soon WordPress 2.8.1 is officially released. Probably July 8th or 9th.



. 2009-07-08:

The advisory CORE-2009-0515 is published.







10. *References*



[1] WordPress vulnerabilities in CVE database

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=wordpress

[2] SecuriTeam List of WordPress Vulnerabilities

http://www.securiteam.com/products/W/Wordpress.html

[3] WordPress Vulnerability - YBO Interactive Blog

http://www.ybo-interactive.com/blog/2008/03/30/wordpress-vulnerability/

[4] bablooO/blyat attacks on WP 2.7.0 and 2.7.1

http://wordpress.org/support/topic/280748

[5] Security breach - xkcd blog

http://blag.xkcd.com/2009/06/18/security-breach/

[6] securityvulns.com WordPress vulnerabilities digest in English

http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/485786/100/0/threaded

[7] CVE-2008-0196

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-0196

[8] WordPress Roles and Capabilities

http://codex.wordpress.org/Roles_and_Capabilities

[9] WordPress Download Counter

http://wordpress.org/download/counter/

[10] WordPress Intrusion Detection System Plugin

http://php-ids.org/2008/02/21/wpids-version-012-released/

[11] Hardening WordPress with htaccess

http://blogsecurity.net/wordpress/article-210607





11. *About CoreLabs*



CoreLabs, the research center of Core Security Technologies, is charged

with anticipating the future needs and requirements for information

security technologies. We conduct our research in several important

areas of computer security including system vulnerabilities, cyber

attack planning and simulation, source code auditing, and cryptography.

Our results include problem formalization, identification of

vulnerabilities, novel solutions and prototypes for new technologies.

CoreLabs regularly publishes security advisories, technical papers,

project information and shared software tools for public use at:

http://www.coresecurity.com/corelabs.





12. *About Core Security Technologies*



Core Security Technologies develops strategic solutions that help

security-conscious organizations worldwide develop and maintain a

proactive process for securing their networks. The company's flagship

product, CORE IMPACT, is the most comprehensive product for performing

enterprise security assurance testing. CORE IMPACT evaluates network,

endpoint and end-user vulnerabilities and identifies what resources are

exposed. It enables organizations to determine if current security

investments are detecting and preventing attacks. Core Security

Technologies augments its leading technology solution with world-class

security consulting services, including penetration testing and software

security auditing. Based in Boston, MA and Buenos Aires, Argentina, Core

Security Technologies can be reached at 617-399-6980 or on the Web at

http://www.coresecurity.com.





13. *Disclaimer*



The contents of this advisory are copyright (c) 2009 Core Security

Technologies and (c) 2009 CoreLabs, and may be distributed freely

provided that no fee is charged for this distribution and proper credit

is given.





14. *PGP/GPG Keys*



This advisory has been signed with the GPG key of Core Security

Technologies advisories team, which is available for download at

http://www.coresecurity.com/files/attachments/core_security_advisories.asc.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)

Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org



iD8DBQFKVR7gyNibggitWa0RAin3AKCOrLLQ8XZnrCLot5d9xoZW6sdWwwCfTJ4N

TPRpR0Gn0WqmF8HOeDslbA8=

=zEDK

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



# milw0rm.com [2009-07-10]

View on GitHub